Thursday, December 26, 2019

Timeline of US-North Korean Relations

Take a look at the US-North Korean relationship from 1950 to the present. 1950-1953 WarThe Korean War was fought on the Korean Peninsula between the Chinese supported forces in the north and the American supported, United Nations forces in the south. 1953 CeasefireOpen warfare stops with a ceasefire agreement on July 27. The peninsula is divided by a demilitarized zone (DMZ) along the 38th parallel. The north is the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the south becomes the Republic of Korea (ROK). A formal peace agreement ending the Korean War has not yet been signed. 1968 USS PuebloThe DPRK captures the USS Pueblo, an American intelligence gathering ship. Although the crew is later released, the North Koreans still hold the USS Pueblo. 1969 Shot DownAn American reconnaissance plane is shot down by North Korea. Thirty-one Americans are killed. 1994 New LeaderKim Il Sung, known as the Great Leader of the DPRK since 1948 dies. His son, Kim Jong Il, assumes power and is known as the Dear Leader. 1995 Nuclear CooperationAgreement reached with the United States to build nuclear reactors in DPRK. 1998 Missile Test?In what appears to be a test flight, the DPRK sends a missile flying over Japan. 2002 Axis of EvilIn his 2002 State of the Union Address, President George W. Bush labeled North Korea as part an Axis of Evil along with Iran and Iraq. 2002 ClashUnited States stops oil shipments to DPRK in a dispute over the countrys secretive nuclear weapons program. DPRK removes international nuclear inspectors. 2003 Diplomatic MovesDPRK withdraws from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. So-called Six Party talks open between the United States, China, Russia, Japan, South Korea, and North Korea. 2005 Outpost of TyrannyIn her Senate confirmation testimony to become Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice listed North Korea as one of several Outposts of Tyranny in the world. 2006 More MissilesDPRK test fires a number of missiles and later conducts a test explosion of a nuclear device. 2007 Agreement?Six Party talks early in the year lead to a plan for North Korea to shut down its nuclear enrichment program and allow for international inspections. But the agreement has still not been implemented. 2007 BreakthroughIn September, U.S. State Department announces North Korea will catalog and dismantle its entire nuclear program by the end of the year. Speculation follows that North Korea will be removed from the U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism. More diplomatic breakthroughs, including discussion of ending the Korean War, follow in October. 2007 Mr. PostmanIn December, President Bush sends a handwritten letter to North Korean leader Kim Jong Il. 2008 More Progress?Speculation runs high in June that President Bush will ask that North Korea be removed from the U.S. terror watch list in acknowledgment of progress in the six-party talks. Removed From ListIn October, President Bush formally removed North Korea from the U.S. terror watch list.

Tuesday, December 17, 2019

Huntington And Mamdani s Views On Culture And Islam

Huntington and Mamdani make two very different arguments. They both make points about what causes conflict. Huntington describes his theories on a future â€Å"clash of civilizations† while Mamdani argues that 9/11 did not happen because of a clash of civilizations. Mamdani also disagrees with Huntington’s opinions on culture and Islam. Huntington believes that the world can be organized by civilizations based on culture instead of political or economic systems. Huntington focuses on two civilizations, Western civilization and Islamic civilization. Huntington believes that these civilizations will face inevitable conflict. The sources of conflict may be struggles for military, economic, and institutional power or it may come from differences in basic values and beliefs between the two cultures. Huntington states â€Å"It is my hypothesis that the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily ideological or primarily economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural...the clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future† (Huntington, pg. 22). Mamdani says Huntington’s argument â€Å"was built around two ideas: that since the end of the Cold War ‘the iron curtain of ideology’ had been replaced by a ‘velvet curtain of culture,’ and that the velvet curtain had been drawn across ‘the bloody borders of Islam† (Mamdani, pg. 21).Show MoreRelatedMuslims After 9/112726 Words   |  11 Pagesconstantly fighting against prejudice. After September 11, media interest in Islam increased, where Islam was usually portrayed in a negative way. Before 9/11, many Muslims lived the normal, everyday life. However, the attack has changed lives of many people that belonged to the Muslim community, where they were the victims of guilt. Unfortunately, many Americans were introduced to Islam, after the 9/11 attack, thus even till today, Islam is associated with terrorism. For the past ten years, Muslims felt excludedRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 PagesPublic Memories Tiffany Ruby Patterson, Zora Neale Hurston and a History of Southern Life Lisa M. Fine, The Story of Reo Joe: Work, Kin, and Community in Autotown, U.S.A. Van Gosse and Richard Moser, eds., The World the Sixties Made: Politics and Culture in Recent America Joanne Meyerowitz, ed., History and September 11th John McMillian and Paul Buhle, eds., The New Left Revisited David M. Scobey, Empire City: The Making and Meaning of the New York City Landscape Gerda Lerner, Fireweed: A Political

Monday, December 9, 2019

Gary Paulsen Essay Research Paper Gary PaulsenBorn free essay sample

Gary Paulsen Essay, Research Paper Gary Paulsen Born May 17, 1939, Gary Paulsen is one of America # 8217 ; s most popular authors for immature people. Although he was neer a dedicated pupil, Paulsen developed a passion for reading at an early age. After a librarian gave him a book to read, along with his ain library card he was hooked. He began passing hours entirely in the cellar of his flat edifice, reading one book after another. Runing off from place at the age of 14 and going with a carnival, Paulsen gained a gustatory sensation for escapade. A vernal summer of tough jobs on a farm, excessively many occupations to number, and two unit of ammunitions of the 1,180-mile Alaskan Canis familiaris sled race, the Iditarod ; have provided abundant stuff from which he creates his powerful narratives. Paulsen # 8217 ; s realisation that he would go a author came all of a sudden when he was working as a orbiter technician for an aerospace company in California. We will write a custom essay sample on Gary Paulsen Essay Research Paper Gary PaulsenBorn or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page One dark he walked off the occupation, neer to return. He spent the following twelvemonth in Hollywood as a magazine proofreader, working on his ain authorship every dark. Then he left California and drove to northern Minnesota where he rented a cabin on a lake ; by the terminal of the winter, he had completed his first novel. Populating in the distant Minnes ota forests, Paulsen shortly turned to the athletics of Canis familiaris racing, and entered the 1983 Iditarod. This led to his ulterior novels ; Woodsong and Dogsong. Paulsen’s overpowering belief in immature people that drives him to compose. His intense desire to tap profoundly into the human spirit and to promote readers to detect and care about the universe around them has brought him both tremendous popularity with immature people and critical award from the children’s book community. Paulsen is a maestro narrator who has written more than 175 books and some 200 articles and short narratives for kids and grownups. He is one of the most of import authors of immature grownup literature today. My personal penetrations while reading Paulsen? s books are that he can do novels that conveying true life into focal point. He can demo deep emotions through a rugged out-of-doorss book. He besides shows huge content and great construction in his books. Most of all I like his manner and how he likes to compose about his self-events. I think his work is most first-class. He is my favourite writer and he lets himself show what he is experiencing. I chose this book because I have read many of his old books and they are great. He is an first-class writer and I will go on to maintain reading his books.

Monday, December 2, 2019

Murder of Words free essay sample

Murder, Revenge, and regret haunt the maddened minds and hearts of Antonio Salieri and Montrisor. The way the murder was thought out, the reason and type of revenge growing in the depths of the two men’s hearts and the sickening regret of the horrific crime that is buried in their souls are all things done similarly or completely different in the move â€Å"Amadeus† and fictional, horror story A Cask of Amontillado by Edgar Allen Poe by the characters Antonio Salieri and Montrisor. In â€Å"Amadeus†, Salieri was jealous of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart’s composing ability, believing that God was making fun of him through the immature boy. Montrisor, from Cask of Amontillado, had spent years of hurt from Fortunato and wished revenge for the pain. â€Å"The only thing that worried me was the actual killing,† (Shaffer.) Salieri told Father Vogler. In Salieri’s mind his plan was â€Å"†¦so simple it terrified me† (Shaffer. We will write a custom essay sample on Murder of Words or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page ). He planned to kill Mozart but was not sure how to achieve his death. Montrisor, however, had years of planning Fortunato’s death. â€Å"I must not only punish but punish with impunity† (Poe.). He had Fortunato’s whole ‘punishment’ planned out in his head but waited for the perfect moment to put that plan in action. Salieri’s plan was thought out quickly and was simple while Montrisor’s plan was simple but thoroughly thought out and carefully put together. The want of revenge can grow and become very dangerous. Jealousy of Mozart’s composing skills and revenge to God by giving Salieri the will and dream to be a great composer and Mozart’s amazing composing ability burn in Salieri’s mind and heart. Salieri is so overcome by this jealousy and revenge that it’s all he thought about. In Salieri’s plan, at Mozart’s funeral there would be a song playing â€Å"composed by his devoted friend, Antonio Salieri† (Shaffer.). The music would be playing â€Å"and God is forced to listen! Powerless, powerless to stop it! I, for once in the end, laughing at him† (Shaffer.). Salieri truly believed that God had been laughing at him through Mozart and wanted to find a way to out-do God and it came back to bite him. Montrisor, however, did not kill from jealousy or bizarre thoughts but â€Å"the thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could† (Poe.) He wanted revenge on the injuries Fortunato had caused, though they may not have been physical or intended. He pretended to be Fortunato’s friend then listened closely to Fortunato’s cries as he walled him in and buried him alive. While Salieri was trying to accomplish revenge on God Montrisor had the feelings built up over years. Salieri’s revenge was driven by sudden jealousy. At one point or another we all do something we regret and need to go back and apologize for but the things that Sal ieri and Montrisor did for revenge they could never take back. â€Å"He killed Mozart and kept me alive to torture† (Shaffer.) shows Salieri regretted killing Mozart and he couldn’t live with Mozart’s death haunting him. Salieri’s regret was eating him alive and driving him mad until he made a failed attempt to end his own life. He had watched Mozart’s health deteriorate before his own eyes and was just a little regretful near the end but the regret got much worse once Mozart was dead. Montrisor, on the other hand, took in Fortunato’s cries for help and mercy and mocked him. He enjoyed listening to the cries of despair as he buried Fortunato alive. He felt no regret during the act of killing Fortunato or after it was done. When he finishes walling Fortunato in, he says in Latin, â€Å"In pace requiescat!† The phrase means ‘May he rest in peace!’ Salieri hated himself after his awful crime but Montrisor had no regret, glad that Fortunato was dead. Salieri and Montrisor had different ways of thinking out the hideous deed, similar reasons for the murder yet different types of revenge, and one was tortured by regret of the crime that can never be undone while the other faces the world with eyes that are glad his victim is gone forever.